/*! @file Forward declares `boost::hana::unpack`. @copyright Louis Dionne 2013-2016 Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying file LICENSE.md or copy at http://boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt) */ #ifndef BOOST_HANA_FWD_UNPACK_HPP #define BOOST_HANA_FWD_UNPACK_HPP #include #include BOOST_HANA_NAMESPACE_BEGIN //! Invoke a function with the elements of a Foldable as arguments. //! @ingroup group-Foldable //! //! Given a function and a foldable structure whose length can be known at //! compile-time, `unpack` invokes the function with the contents of that //! structure. In other words, `unpack(xs, f)` is equivalent to `f(x...)`, //! where `x...` are the elements of the structure. The length of the //! structure must be known at compile-time, because the version of `f`'s //! `operator()` that will be compiled depends on the number of arguments //! it is called with, which has to be known at compile-time. //! //! To create a function that accepts a foldable instead of variadic //! arguments, see `fuse` instead. //! //! //! @param xs //! The structure to expand into the function. //! //! @param f //! A function to be invoked as `f(x...)`, where `x...` are the elements //! of the structure as-if they had been linearized with `to`. //! //! //! Example //! ------- //! @include example/unpack.cpp //! //! //! Rationale: `unpack`'s name and parameter order //! ---------------------------------------------- //! It has been suggested a couple of times that `unpack` be called //! `apply` instead, and that the parameter order be reversed to match //! that of the [proposed std::apply function][1]. However, the name //! `apply` is already used to denote normal function application, an use //! which is consistent with the Boost MPL library and with the rest of //! the world, especially the functional programming community. //! Furthermore, the author of this library considers the proposed //! `std::apply` to have both an unfortunate name and an unfortunate //! parameter order. Indeed, taking the function as the first argument //! means that using `std::apply` with a lambda function looks like //! @code //! std::apply([](auto ...args) { //! use(args...); //! }, tuple); //! @endcode //! //! which is undeniably ugly because of the trailing `, tuple)` part //! on the last line. On the other hand, taking the function as a //! second argument allows one to write //! @code //! hana::unpack(tuple, [](auto ...args) { //! use(args...); //! }); //! @endcode //! //! which looks much nicer. Because of these observations, the author //! of this library feels justified to use `unpack` instead of `apply`, //! and to use a sane parameter order. //! //! [1]: http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/experimental/apply #ifdef BOOST_HANA_DOXYGEN_INVOKED constexpr auto unpack = [](auto&& xs, auto&& f) -> decltype(auto) { return tag-dispatched; }; #else template struct unpack_impl : unpack_impl> { }; struct unpack_t { template constexpr decltype(auto) operator()(Xs&& xs, F&& f) const; }; constexpr unpack_t unpack{}; #endif BOOST_HANA_NAMESPACE_END #endif // !BOOST_HANA_FWD_UNPACK_HPP