Refactor tests and codes

Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <clark.wangs@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Clark Wang 2014-09-03 19:58:39 +08:00
parent 26547f8461
commit b6f2026493
2 changed files with 191 additions and 152 deletions

View File

@ -540,13 +540,17 @@ RelationDefinition.hasMany = function hasMany(modelFrom, modelTo, params) {
var relationName = params.as || i8n.camelize(modelTo.pluralModelName, true);
var fk = params.foreignKey || i8n.camelize(thisClassName + '_id', true);
var keyThrough = params.keyThrough || i8n.camelize(modelTo.modelName + '_id', true);
var idName = modelFrom.dataSource.idName(modelFrom.modelName) || 'id';
var discriminator, polymorphic;
if (params.polymorphic) {
polymorphic = polymorphicParams(params.polymorphic);
if (params.invert) polymorphic.invert = true;
if (params.invert) {
polymorphic.invert = true;
keyThrough = polymorphic.foreignKey;
}
discriminator = polymorphic.discriminator;
if (!params.invert) {
fk = polymorphic.foreignKey;
@ -567,14 +571,12 @@ RelationDefinition.hasMany = function hasMany(modelFrom, modelTo, params) {
properties: params.properties,
scope: params.scope,
options: params.options,
keyThrough: keyThrough,
polymorphic: polymorphic
});
definition.modelThrough = params.through;
var keyThrough = params.keyThrough || i8n.camelize(modelTo.modelName + '_id', true);
definition.keyThrough = keyThrough;
modelFrom.relations[relationName] = definition;
if (!params.through) {
@ -636,32 +638,35 @@ RelationDefinition.hasMany = function hasMany(modelFrom, modelTo, params) {
definition.applyScope(this, filter);
if (params.through) {
if (definition.modelThrough) {
// find corresponding belongsTo relations from through model as include
var include = [];
Object.keys(params.through.relations).forEach(function (rn) {
var relation = params.through.relations[rn];
// find corresponding belongsTo relations from through model as collect
var throughRelationName;
for(var r in definition.modelThrough.relations) {
var relation = definition.modelThrough.relations[r];
// should be a belongsTo and match modelTo
if (relation.type === RelationTypes.belongsTo && relation.modelTo === modelTo) {
// should match keyThrough if specified
if (params.keyThrough && relation.keyFrom !== params.keyThrough) return;
if (include.indexOf(relation.name) === -1) {
include.push(relation.name);
}
// should be a belongsTo and match modelTo and keyThrough
// if relation is polymorphic then check keyThrough only
if (relation.type === RelationTypes.belongsTo &&
(relation.polymorphic && !relation.modelTo || relation.modelTo === definition.modelTo) &&
(relation.keyFrom === definition.keyThrough)
) {
throughRelationName = relation.name;
break;
}
});
}
if (params.polymorphic && params.invert) {
filter.where[discriminator] = modelTo.modelName; // overwrite
filter.collect = params.polymorphic;
if (!throughRelationName) {
throw new Error('Relation "' + relationName + '": Can\'t find belongsTo relation in through model '
+ definition.modelThrough.modelName + '.');
}
if (definition.polymorphic && definition.polymorphic.invert) {
filter.collect = throughRelationName || definition.polymorphic.as;
filter.include = filter.collect;
} else {
filter.collect = i8n.camelize(modelTo.modelName, true);
filter.include = include.join();
filter.collect = throughRelationName || i8n.camelize(modelTo.modelName, true);
filter.include = filter.collect;
}
}

View File

@ -257,17 +257,6 @@ describe('relations', function () {
});
});
it('should have scope that includes a relation name which is derived from model\'s name', function (done) {
Physician.create(function (err, physician) {
should.not.exist(err);
should.exist(physician);
var scope = physician.patients._scope;
scope.should.have.property('collect', 'patient');
scope.should.have.property('include', 'patient');
done(err);
});
});
it('should build record on scope', function (done) {
Physician.create(function (err, physician) {
var patient = physician.patients.build();
@ -474,133 +463,159 @@ describe('relations', function () {
});
describe('hasMany through with custom relation name', function () {
describe('hasMany through - collect', function () {
var Physician, Patient, Appointment, Address;
describe('and with keyThrough', function () {
before(function (done) {
db = getSchema();
Physician = db.define('Physician', {name: String});
Patient = db.define('Patient', {name: String});
Appointment = db.define('Appointment', {date: {type: Date,
default: function () {
return new Date();
}}});
Address = db.define('Address', {name: String});
beforeEach(function (done) {
db = getSchema();
Physician = db.define('Physician', {name: String});
Patient = db.define('Patient', {name: String});
Appointment = db.define('Appointment', {date: {type: Date,
default: function () {
return new Date();
}}});
Address = db.define('Address', {name: String});
db.automigrate(['Physician', 'Patient', 'Appointment', 'Address'], function (err) {
done(err);
});
});
describe('with default options', function () {
it('can determine the collect by modelTo\'s name as default', function () {
Physician.hasMany(Patient, {through: Appointment});
Patient.hasMany(Physician, {through: Appointment});
Patient.belongsTo(Address);
Appointment.belongsTo(Physician);
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient);
var physician = new Physician({id: 1});
var scope1 = physician.patients._scope;
scope1.should.have.property('collect', 'patient');
scope1.should.have.property('include', 'patient');
var patient = new Patient({id: 1});
var scope2 = patient.physicians._scope;
scope2.should.have.property('collect', 'physician');
scope2.should.have.property('include', 'physician');
});
it('should be irrelevant to the name of hasManyThrough relation', function () {
Physician.hasMany(Patient, {through: Appointment, as: 'xxx'});
Patient.hasMany(Physician, {through: Appointment, as: 'yyy'});
Patient.belongsTo(Address);
Appointment.belongsTo(Physician);
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient);
var physician = new Physician({id: 1});
var scope1 = physician.xxx._scope;
scope1.should.have.property('collect', 'patient');
scope1.should.have.property('include', 'patient');
var patient = new Patient({id: 1});
var scope2 = patient.yyy._scope;
scope2.should.have.property('collect', 'physician');
scope2.should.have.property('include', 'physician');
});
});
describe('when custom reverse belongsTo names for both sides', function () {
it('can determine the collect via keyThrough', function () {
Physician.hasMany(Patient, {as: 'xxx', foreignKey: 'fooId', keyThrough: 'barId', through: Appointment});
Patient.hasMany(Physician, {as: 'yyy', foreignKey: 'barId', keyThrough: 'fooId', through: Appointment});
Appointment.belongsTo(Physician, {as: 'foo'});
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient, {as: 'bar'});
Patient.belongsTo(Address); // jam.
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient, {as: 'car'}); // jam. Should we complain in this case???
var physician = new Physician({id: 1});
var scope1 = physician.xxx._scope;
scope1.should.have.property('collect', 'bar');
scope1.should.have.property('include', 'bar');
var patient = new Patient({id: 1});
var scope2 = patient.yyy._scope;
scope2.should.have.property('collect', 'foo');
scope2.should.have.property('include', 'foo');
});
it('can determine the collect via modelTo name', function () {
Physician.hasMany(Patient, {through: Appointment});
Patient.hasMany(Physician, {through: Appointment});
Appointment.belongsTo(Physician, {as: 'foo', foreignKey: 'physicianId'});
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient, {as: 'bar', foreignKey: 'patientId'});
Patient.belongsTo(Address); // jam.
var physician = new Physician({id: 1});
var scope1 = physician.patients._scope;
scope1.should.have.property('collect', 'bar');
scope1.should.have.property('include', 'bar');
var patient = new Patient({id: 1});
var scope2 = patient.physicians._scope;
scope2.should.have.property('collect', 'foo');
scope2.should.have.property('include', 'foo');
});
it('can determine the collect via modelTo name - error', function () {
Physician.hasMany(Patient, {through: Appointment});
Patient.hasMany(Physician, {through: Appointment});
Appointment.belongsTo(Physician, {as: 'foo', foreignKey: 'physicianId'});
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient, {as: 'bar', foreignKey: 'patientId'});
Patient.belongsTo(Address); // jam.
Appointment.belongsTo(Physician, {as: 'goo', foreignKey: 'physicianId'}); // jam. Should we complain in this case???
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient, {as: 'car', foreignKey: 'patientId'}); // jam. Should we complain in this case???
var physician = new Physician({id: 1});
var scope1 = physician.patients._scope;
scope1.should.have.property('collect', 'bar');
scope1.should.have.property('include', 'bar');
var patient = new Patient({id: 1});
var scope2 = patient.physicians._scope;
scope2.should.have.property('collect', 'foo');
scope2.should.have.property('include', 'foo');
});
it('should be irrelevant to the name of hasManyThrough relation', function () {
Physician.hasMany(Patient, {foreignKey: 'fooId', keyThrough: 'barId', through: Appointment});
Patient.hasMany(Physician, {foreignKey: 'barId', keyThrough: 'fooId', through: Appointment});
Patient.belongsTo(Address);
Appointment.belongsTo(Physician, {as: 'foo'});
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient, {as: 'bar'});
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient, {as: 'car'});
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient, {as: 'dar'});
db.automigrate(['Physician', 'Patient', 'Appointment', 'Address'], function (err) {
done(err);
});
});
it('should have scope that includes relation name which matches keyThrough', function (done) {
Physician.create(function (err, physician) {
should.not.exist(err);
should.exist(physician);
var scope = physician.xxx._scope;
scope.should.have.property('collect', 'patient');
scope.should.have.property('include', 'bar');
done(err);
});
});
it('should fetch all scoped instances', function (done) {
Physician.create(function (err, physician) {
physician.xxx.create({name: 'a'}, function () {
physician.xxx.create({name: 'z'}, function () {
physician.xxx.create({name: 'c'}, function () {
verify(physician);
});
});
});
});
function verify(physician) {
physician.xxx(true, function (err, ch) {
should.not.exist(err);
should.exist(ch);
ch.should.have.lengthOf(3);
done();
});
}
var physician = new Physician({id: 1});
var scope1 = physician.patients._scope;
scope1.should.have.property('collect', 'bar');
scope1.should.have.property('include', 'bar');
var patient = new Patient({id: 1});
var scope2 = patient.physicians._scope;
scope2.should.have.property('collect', 'foo');
scope2.should.have.property('include', 'foo');
});
});
describe('and without keyThrough', function () {
before(function (done) {
db = getSchema();
Physician = db.define('Physician', {name: String});
Patient = db.define('Patient', {name: String});
Appointment = db.define('Appointment', {date: {type: Date,
default: function () {
return new Date();
}}});
Address = db.define('Address', {name: String});
describe('when custom reverse belongsTo name for one side only', function () {
Physician.hasMany(Patient, {as: 'xxx', foreignKey: 'fooId', through: Appointment});
Patient.hasMany(Physician, {as: 'yyy', foreignKey: 'barId', through: Appointment});
Patient.belongsTo(Address);
beforeEach(function () {
Physician.hasMany(Patient, {as: 'xxx', through: Appointment, foreignKey: 'fooId'});
Patient.hasMany(Physician, {as: 'yyy', through: Appointment, keyThrough: 'fooId'});
Appointment.belongsTo(Physician, {as: 'foo'});
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient, {as: 'bar'});
db.automigrate(['Physician', 'Patient', 'Appointment', 'Address'], function (err) {
done(err);
});
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient);
Patient.belongsTo(Address); // jam.
Appointment.belongsTo(Physician, {as: 'bar'}); // jam. Should we complain in this case???
});
it('should have scope that includes relation name which matches the name of modelTo', function (done) {
Physician.create(function (err, physician) {
should.not.exist(err);
should.exist(physician);
var scope = physician.xxx._scope;
scope.should.have.property('collect', 'patient');
scope.should.have.property('include', 'bar');
done(err);
});
});
});
describe('and with multiple relations for same model', function () {
before(function (done) {
db = getSchema();
Physician = db.define('Physician', {name: String});
Patient = db.define('Patient', {name: String});
Appointment = db.define('Appointment', {date: {type: Date,
default: function () {
return new Date();
}}});
Address = db.define('Address', {name: String});
Physician.hasMany(Patient, {as: 'xxx', foreignKey: 'fooId', through: Appointment});
Patient.hasMany(Physician, {as: 'yyy', foreignKey: 'barId', through: Appointment});
Patient.belongsTo(Address);
Appointment.belongsTo(Physician, {as: 'foo'});
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient, {as: 'bar'});
Appointment.belongsTo(Patient, {as: 'car'});
db.automigrate(['Physician', 'Patient', 'Appointment', 'Address'], function (err) {
done(err);
});
it('can determine the collect via model name', function () {
var physician = new Physician({id: 1});
var scope1 = physician.xxx._scope;
scope1.should.have.property('collect', 'patient');
scope1.should.have.property('include', 'patient');
});
it('should have scope that includes all relation names which matches the name of modelTo', function (done) {
Physician.create(function (err, physician) {
should.not.exist(err);
should.exist(physician);
var scope = physician.xxx._scope;
scope.should.have.property('collect', 'patient');
scope.should.have.property('include', 'bar,car');
done(err);
});
it('can determine the collect via keyThrough', function () {
var patient = new Patient({id: 1});
var scope2 = patient.yyy._scope;
scope2.should.have.property('collect', 'foo');
scope2.should.have.property('include', 'foo');
});
});
});
describe('hasMany through between same model', function () {
describe('hasMany through - between same model', function () {
var User, Follow, Address;
before(function (done) {
@ -622,18 +637,14 @@ describe('relations', function () {
});
});
it('should have scope that includes corresponding relation name', function (done) {
User.create(function (err, user) {
should.not.exist(err);
should.exist(user);
var scope1 = user.followers._scope;
scope1.should.have.property('collect', 'user');
scope1.should.have.property('include', 'follower');
var scope2 = user.following._scope;
scope2.should.have.property('collect', 'user');
scope2.should.have.property('include', 'followee');
done();
});
it('can determine the collect via keyThrough for each side', function () {
var user = new User({id: 1});
var scope1 = user.followers._scope;
scope1.should.have.property('collect', 'follower');
scope1.should.have.property('include', 'follower');
var scope2 = user.following._scope;
scope2.should.have.property('collect', 'followee');
scope2.should.have.property('include', 'followee');
});
});
@ -1089,6 +1100,29 @@ describe('relations', function () {
db.automigrate(done);
});
it('can determine the collect via modelTo name', function () {
Author.hasAndBelongsToMany(Picture, { through: PictureLink, polymorphic: 'imageable' });
Reader.hasAndBelongsToMany(Picture, { through: PictureLink, polymorphic: 'imageable' });
// Optionally, define inverse relations:
Picture.hasMany(Author, { through: PictureLink, polymorphic: 'imageable', invert: true });
Picture.hasMany(Reader, { through: PictureLink, polymorphic: 'imageable', invert: true });
var author = new Author({id: 1});
var scope1 = author.pictures._scope;
scope1.should.have.property('collect', 'picture');
scope1.should.have.property('include', 'picture');
var reader = new Reader({id: 1});
var scope2 = reader.pictures._scope;
scope2.should.have.property('collect', 'picture');
scope2.should.have.property('include', 'picture');
var picture = new Picture({id: 1});
var scope3 = picture.authors._scope;
scope3.should.have.property('collect', 'imageable');
scope3.should.have.property('include', 'imageable');
var scope4 = picture.readers._scope;
scope4.should.have.property('collect', 'imageable');
scope4.should.have.property('include', 'imageable');
});
var author, reader, pictures = [];
it('should create polymorphic relation - author', function (done) {
Author.create({ name: 'Author 1' }, function (err, a) {