merged in Schoons' changes to mobile clients section
This commit is contained in:
commit
c136d2995f
|
@ -31,34 +31,36 @@ notifications, register users, and any other behavior provided by data sources.
|
|||
|
||||
### Mobile Clients
|
||||
|
||||
LoopBack Mobile Client SDKs give mobile developers access to
|
||||
mobile models and services from within their native
|
||||
development environment and language.
|
||||
LoopBack provides native Client SDKs to give mobile developers access to remote,
|
||||
persistent data in a contextually-relevant way. The transport and marshalling of
|
||||
the data is taken care of, and mobile developers can leverage all of their
|
||||
existing tools (XCode, Eclipse, et al) to model their data on the client,
|
||||
persisting it to the server as needed.
|
||||
|
||||
LoopBack SDK's support both predefined static schema's and dynamic
|
||||
'schema-less'mobile models.
|
||||
To achieve this, LoopBack supports both "Dynamic", schema-less Models and
|
||||
"Static", schema-driven Models. (See ["Models"](#models) for more specifics and
|
||||
how-tos around Model creation.)
|
||||
|
||||
A Dynamic or Schema-less model strategy allows mobile developer to
|
||||
define custom model definitions directly from the SDK that are often
|
||||
specific to a mobile application needs. Similar to 'Document
|
||||
Storage' solutions such as Redis or MongoDB. Dynamic models have
|
||||
the added benefit of allowing mobile developers to work with
|
||||
LoopBack as a Mobile back end-as-a-service (mBaaS) without having to
|
||||
predefine the model definition on the server. This strategy is
|
||||
often leveraged for data that originates on the mobile device and
|
||||
then persisted in the Mobile backend for later mobile consumption or
|
||||
server side processing.
|
||||
Dynamic Models require minimal server code up front (just a name!) to set-up,
|
||||
with the format of the data specified _completely_ and _flexibly_ by the client
|
||||
application. Well-suited for data that _originates on the client_, mobile
|
||||
developers can leverage Dynamic Models to persist data both between sessions and
|
||||
between _devices_ while obviating the need for outside engineering support.
|
||||
(Let's be honest - how many server programmers do you know that are _excited_
|
||||
when you ask them to add a field to some schema on the server? None? That's what
|
||||
we thought.)
|
||||
|
||||
Static or traditional schema strategies are also supported in
|
||||
LoopBack. A static model configuration promote a consistency in
|
||||
mobile model data and provides easy integration or direct binding to
|
||||
traditional RDBMs such as Oracle and MySQL. The added governance and
|
||||
reliability in providing a 'rigid' model also promotes more robust
|
||||
data integrity, validation and standardization.
|
||||
Static Models require more code up front in an extended grammar of JSON we call
|
||||
LDL, with the format of the data specified _completely_ in a _structured_ way by
|
||||
the server application. Well-suited to both existing data and large, intricate
|
||||
datasets, mobile developers can leverage Static Models to provide structure and
|
||||
consistency to their data, preventing the multitude of bugs that can result from
|
||||
unexpected data in their database. (These pesky bugs _love_ to show up in
|
||||
production and ruin everyone's launch day. Stop them before they start!)
|
||||
|
||||
The ability to leverage either or both strategies in a mobile middle
|
||||
tier allows developers to select the best implementation for their
|
||||
use case.
|
||||
Use one strategy, or use both. Leverage them to fit your _use case_, rather than
|
||||
fitting your use case to some fixed modelling strategy. The choice is yours.
|
||||
>>>>>>> 315218c79b59a51b5c3e2d93388ffb65d3510525
|
||||
|
||||
### Models
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue