Update PersistedModel.findOrCreate() JSDoc to reflect the
callback accepts an additional created boolean parameter.
This is a back-port of pull request #1983 from noderat/patch-1
Fix `getIdFromWhereByModelId()` to correctly detect the situation
when "bulkUpdate" performs a write operation using a where filter
containing both id attribute but also all other model attributes.
This should significantly improve the performance of change replication,
because the cost of running rectifyAll is very high.
Improve the id-detection algorithm in the "after save" hook
to correctly handle "updateAttributes" as a single-model change
and DO NOT trigger full "rectify all" scan.
The decision which Promise implementation to use should be made by
LoopBack user, not by the framework.
This commit moves Bluebird reference from lib/utils.js to
test/support.js.
Modify `app.enableAuth` to automaticaly setup all required models
that are not attached to the app nor a datasource.
Users wishing to use this option must provide the name of the
data-source to use for these models.
Example usage:
var app = loopback();
app.dataSource('db', { connector: 'memory' });
app.enableAuth({ dataSource: 'db' });
app.use(loopback.rest());
app.listen(3000);
When creating an application with a local registry, the default
behaviour is to define only two core models Model & PersistedModel.
The new flag `loadBuiltinModels` modifies this behaviour and instructs
loopback to define all builtin models in the local registry too.
Process `settings.methods` and `config.methods` as a key-value map
where the key is the method name and the value is an object describing
the method in the format expected by strong-remoting.
Example: a static method `Model.create`
"methods": {
"create": {
"isStatic": true,
"accepts": {
"arg": "data", "type": "Car",
"http": { "source": "body" }
},
"returns": { "arg": "data", "type": "Car", "root": true }
}
}
This patch is based on the code proposed by @mrfelton in #1163.
This patch fixes the method Model.getApp() that started to report
the following error after b61fae5 was landed:
assert.js:88
throw new assert.AssertionError({
^
AssertionError: undefined == true
at loopback/loopback/lib/model.js:392:7
at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (loopback/loopback/lib/model.js:222:9)
at EventEmitter.g (events.js:257:16)
at emitOne (events.js:77:13)
at EventEmitter.emit (events.js:166:7)
at EventEmitter.app.model (loopback/loopback/lib/application.js:157:9)
Fix a regression introduced by b917075 where two loopback projects,
each one using a different instance of loopback module, were
sharing the global registry and thus not working correctly.
The issue was discovered by unit-tests in loopback-workspace.
The commit b917075 accidentally removed a couple of properties,
this commit is bringing them back:
- loopback.modelRegistry
- loopback.defaultDataSources
A unit-test was added to prevent this kind of regressions in the future.
Add end-to-end unit-tests verifying enforcement of access control during
conflict resolution.
Implement two facade methods providing REST API for Change methods used
by conflict resolution:
PersistedModel.findLastChange
GET /api/{model.pluralName}/{id}/changes/last
PersistedModel.updateLastChange
PUT /api/{model.pluralName}/{id}/changes/last
By providing these two methods on PersistedModel, replication users
don't have to expose the Change model via the REST API. What's even
more important, these two methods use the same set of ACL rules
as other (regular) PersistedModel methods.
Rework `Conflict.prototype.changes()` and `Conflict.prototype.resolve()`
to use these new facade methods.
Implement a new method `Conflict.prototype.swapParties()` that provides
better API for the situation when a conflict detected in Remote->Local
replication should be resolved locally (i.e. in the replication target).
Correctly handle the case when the model is attached multiple times
during the lifecycle, this happens because `loopback.createModel`
always makes an attempt to auto-attach.
1) Add integration tests running change replication over REST to verify
that access control at model level is correctly enforced.
2) Implement a new access type "REPLICATE" that allows principals
to create new checkpoints, even though they don't have full WRITE
access to the model. Together with the "READ" permission, these
two types allow principals to replicate (pull) changes from the server.
Note that anybody having "WRITE" access type is automatically
granted "REPLICATE" type too.
3) Add a new model option "enableRemoteReplication" that exposes
replication methods via strong remoting, but does not configure
change rectification. This option should be used the clients
when setting up Remote models attached to the server via the remoting
connector.
Miroslav Bajtoš
Amir Jafarian
crandmck
Richard Pringle
Miroslav Bajtoš
Simon Ho
Miroslav Bajtoš
Richard Walker
Samuel Gaus
Christoph
Pradnya Baviskar
Raymond Feng
Ritchie Martori
Raymond Feng
Edmond Lau