#7058 LeftMenu vitest #1153
|
@ -2,10 +2,11 @@ import { vi, describe, expect, it, beforeAll, beforeEach, afterEach } from 'vite
|
|||
import { createWrapper, axios } from 'app/test/vitest/helper';
|
||||
import Leftmenu from 'components/LeftMenu.vue';
|
||||
import * as vueRouter from 'vue-router';
|
||||
|
||||
import { useNavigationStore } from 'src/stores/useNavigationStore';
|
||||
|
||||
let vm;
|
||||
let navigation;
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock('src/router/modules', () => ({
|
||||
default: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -164,7 +165,7 @@ describe('getRoutes', () => {
|
|||
expect(getMethodA).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
expect(getMethodB).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
//WIP
|
||||
|
||||
it('should call getMethodA when source is main', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
let props = { source: 'methodC' };
|
||||
expect(() => fn(props)).toThrowError('Method not defined');
|
||||
|
@ -184,30 +185,10 @@ describe('Leftmenu as card', () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
describe('Leftmenu as main', () => {
|
||||
beforeAll(() => {
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
vm = mount('main').vm;
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// WIP
|
||||
it.skip('should return a proper formated object with two child items', async () => {
|
||||
const expectedMenuItem = [
|
||||
{
|
||||
children: null,
|
||||
name: 'CustomerList',
|
||||
title: 'globals.pageTitles.list',
|
||||
icon: 'view_list',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
children: null,
|
||||
name: 'CustomerCreate',
|
||||
title: 'globals.pageTitles.createCustomer',
|
||||
icon: 'vn:addperson',
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
const firstMenuItem = vm.items[0];
|
||||
expect(firstMenuItem.children).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining(expectedMenuItem));
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should initialize with default props', () => {
|
||||
expect(vm.source).toBe('main');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
@ -215,7 +196,6 @@ describe('Leftmenu as main', () => {
|
|||
it('should filter items based on search input', async () => {
|
||||
vm.search = 'Rou';
|
||||
jorgep
commented
Estaría bien crear un test que devuelva algún resultado, mockea otra para comprobar que solo te va a devolver esa. Estaría bien crear un test que devuelva algún resultado, mockea otra para comprobar que solo te va a devolver esa.
|
||||
await vm.$nextTick();
|
||||
// expect(vm.filterItems).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
expect(vm.filterItems()).toEqual([]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -343,7 +323,6 @@ describe('normalize', () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// WIP
|
||||
describe('addChildren', () => {
|
||||
jorgep
commented
En estos tests, solo veo que compruebes que la función haya sido llamada, no se debería comprobar si navigation ha cambiado? En estos tests, solo veo que compruebes que la función haya sido llamada, no se debería comprobar si navigation ha cambiado?
|
||||
const route = {
|
||||
meta: {
|
||||
|
@ -378,19 +357,6 @@ describe('addChildren', () => {
|
|||
expect(useNavigationStore().addMenuItem).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// WIP
|
||||
it.skip('should not add menu items if no matches are found', () => {
|
||||
const module = 'testModule';
|
||||
const route = {
|
||||
meta: { menu: 'child3', menuChildren: [] },
|
||||
children: [{ name: 'child3', meta: { menuChildren: [] } }],
|
||||
};
|
||||
const parent = [];
|
||||
|
||||
vm.addChildren(module, route, parent);
|
||||
expect(useNavigationStore().addMenuItem).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should handle routes with no meta menu', () => {
|
||||
const module = 'testModule';
|
||||
const parent = [];
|
||||
|
@ -399,19 +365,6 @@ describe('addChildren', () => {
|
|||
expect(useNavigationStore().addMenuItem).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// WIP
|
||||
it.skip('should handle routes with no matches', () => {
|
||||
const module = 'testModule';
|
||||
const route = {
|
||||
meta: { menu: 'child4' },
|
||||
children: [{ name: 'child4', meta: { menuChildren: [] } }],
|
||||
};
|
||||
const parent = [];
|
||||
|
||||
vm.addChildren(module, route, parent);
|
||||
expect(useNavigationStore().addMenuItem).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should handle empty parent array', () => {
|
||||
const module = 'testModule';
|
||||
const parent = [];
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Poner otro nombre, está repetido.
oh vaya
should not call getMethodA when method is undefined por ej.