When a required number property is set to NaN, for example as a result
of coersion (`Number([1,2,3])`), the "presence" validation now correctly
reports an error.
When building a list of errors for `ValidationError.message`, include
the values of invalid properties too.
In order to keep the message reasonably short, the values are truncated
at approx 32 characters.
If the validator configured with `{async:true}` option and `if/unless`
condition, validator should be skipped when the condition is un-fulfilled,
so the validator should be pass.
But currently, when skipping the validator, it calls `done(true)` which
accepts a `fail` flag as a param, this will fail the entire validation.
Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <clark.wangs@gmail.com>
Previously validations were appended to an array when configured. The
format was cumbersome, and led to issues. This refactors the
configuration into an object, as a property of the Model.
Note that if no validations have been configured, this property is
currently `undefined`.
Call `Error.captureStackTrace()` only when it is available.
Use `this.stack = (new Error).stack` when `captureStackTrace` is not
available but the `stack` property is (Firefox).
Modify ValidationError constructor to include the model name and
a human-readable representation of the validation errors (messages)
in the error message.
Before this change, the message was pointing the reader
to `err.details`. Most frameworks (e.g. express, mocha) log only
`err.message` but not other error properties, thus the logs were
rather unhelpful.
Example of the new error message:
The `User` instance is not valid. Details: `name` can't be blank.
Modify ValidationError constructor to include the model name and
a human-readable representation of the validation errors (messages)
in the error message.
Before this change, the message was pointing the reader
to `err.details`. Most frameworks (e.g. express, mocha) log only
`err.message` but not other error properties, thus the logs were
rather unhelpful.
Example of the new error message:
The `User` instance is not valid. Details: `name` can't be blank.
Modify the "unique" validator to accept additional property names to
narrow the space of rows searched for duplicates.
Example:
Consider `SiteUser` belongsTo `Site` via `siteId` foreign key.
Inside every site, the user email must be unique. It is allowed to
register the same email with multiple sites.
SiteUser.validateUniquenessOf('email', { scopedTo: ['siteId'] });
- change `statusCode` from 400 to 422
- nest `context` and `codes` inside `details`
- add `details.messages`
- reword the main error message
Remove the call to Error's constructor from ValidationError constructor,
because it's a no-op - Error's constructor creates a new
instance when called via `.call()`.
Rand McKinney
David Cheung
Amir Jafarian
Rand McKinney
RobinBiondi
Miroslav Bajtoš
Ryan Graham
Rand McKinney
Fabien Franzen
Samuel Reed
Miroslav Bajtoš
James Billingham
Clark Wang
Raymond Feng
Raymond Feng
Ritchie Martori
Anatoliy Chakkaev