5509-entryDmsBack #2079
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ const UserError = require('vn-loopback/util/user-error');
|
|||
|
||||
module.exports = Self => {
|
||||
Self.remoteMethodCtx('removeFile', {
|
||||
description: 'Removes a claim document',
|
||||
description: 'Removes a entry document',
|
||||
alexm marked this conversation as resolved
Outdated
|
||||
accessType: 'WRITE',
|
||||
accepts: {
|
||||
arg: 'id',
|
||||
|
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ module.exports = Self => {
|
|||
const targetEntryDms = await Self.findById(id, null, myOptions);
|
||||
const targetDms = await Self.app.models.Dms.removeFile(ctx, targetEntryDms.dmsFk, myOptions);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!targetDms || ! targetEntryDms)
|
||||
if (!targetDms)
|
||||
alexm marked this conversation as resolved
Outdated
jsegarra
commented
Mmm creo que la condición debería duplicarse ya que líneas más arriba usas dmsFk Mmm creo que la condición debería duplicarse ya que líneas más arriba usas dmsFk
O si asumimos que la línea 36 SIEMPRE devuelve resultado para que poner ||?
|
||||
throw new UserError('Try again');
|
||||
|
||||
const entryDmsDestroyed = await targetEntryDms.destroy(myOptions);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ module.exports = Self => {
|
|||
accepts: [{
|
||||
arg: 'id',
|
||||
type: 'number',
|
||||
description: 'The claim id',
|
||||
description: 'The entry id',
|
||||
alexm marked this conversation as resolved
Outdated
jsegarra
commented
Claim o entry? Claim o entry?
|
||||
http: {source: 'path'}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Hablamos de claim o entry?